MouthShut.com Would Like to Send You Push Notifications. Notification may includes alerts, activities & updates.

OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
For Business
MouthShut Logo
Upload Photo
Avatar Movie Image

MouthShut Score

97%
4.32 

Plot:

Performance:

Music:

Cinematography:

×

Upload your product photo

Supported file formats : jpg, png, and jpeg

Address



Contact Number

Cancel

I feel this review is:

Fake
Genuine

To justify genuineness of your review kindly attach purchase proof
No File Selected

Avatar-A Visually And Technicaly Appealing Reprise
Dec 20, 2009 04:30 AM 3170 Views
(Updated Dec 20, 2009 05:08 AM)

Plot:

Performance:

Music:

Cinematography:

How many men will you find in this world who can do thinking on unimaginable lines and then dedicate a massive 230 million$ budget to create a movie out of that.


James Cameron after his last creation ‘Titanic’ has done exactly that. He has written, directed and produced this visual masterpiece.


Avatar deserves a 3.75/5


Plot - Avatar’s plot will sound similar to some especially to those


ones who have seen movies like Dancing with Wolves. In Avatar, humans


land onto a planetary body namely Pandora, whose natives are known as


Na’vis. Na’vis form a breed that looks like genetically created


tall-slim-wild chameleons that have blue bodies with sliver sparkles on


them. Their ears are inspired from wild rats and face cuts from cats.


They have their own language. They are natural acrobats and hunt wild


animals using bow-arrow in the majestic dense forests of Africa(oops


Pandora). Some of you like me may draw an analogy of some wild tribe in


Africa with Na’vis of Pandora(and you won’t be totally wrong).


Pandora, the habitat of Na’vis is a green heaven and looks like a dense


tropical forest with giant animals thrown in. More description about


Pandora may dilute its visual beauty, thus I will halt here.


Story


starts with humans landing on Pandora with the intention of mining


unobtanium and taking it away. Humans adopt two strategies for this


purpose. Two strategies are very familiar to us – first is to send a


messenger and second is to fight & destroy(even Ramayana followed


these two strategies but in that epic, the intentions were totally


opposite). Messengers(including our hero – Jake) are transported into


the bodies of Avatar(genetically created Na’vi body-suits). The plan


is to infiltrate into Na’vi clan and then negotiate terms for peace


with humans. Our hero Jake proves himself as a Na’vi warrior through


his female Na’vi acquaintance(Zoe Saldana - our heroine). However,


after successfully becoming a part of the Na’vi clan, he gets to know


the hard reality. The huge-home tree of Na’vis(which looked like a


banyan tree with branches wrapped spirally onto its stem) was standing


on the vast resource of the metal which humans wanted. After knowing


that the messenger idea is of no use, humans go for the second option


of destroying. Rest of the story is predictable of how they themselves


got destroyed!



Castings in science movies do not have a pivotal role. Our human hero Jake(played by Sam Worthington) is a paralyzed ex-Marine and our Na’vi heroine Ney’tiri is played by Zoe Saldana.


Both have given satisfactory performances. The ‘main’ villain of the


movie, as you may call him is the military head of humans, Col. Miles


Quaritch(played by bodybuilder Stephan Lang).


His performance should have been more powerful. Rather than showing


aggression through pumping iron on a benchpress, he should have been


fiercer in his acts. He looks powerful but not overly dangerous(even


though his military-fashion-growling is continuous). You may find a bit


amusing to accept it but some military acts reminded me of recently


released G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra.


Visuals


are top-class. You will not get better visual movies than this. It can


be easily compared to LOTR(Lord of the Rings – pioneer movie when you


talk about ‘graphics’). The effort gone into R&D of Na’vi people


and to create the universe of Pandora is huge. One can understand 12


years of its making. However, Avatar could have been better. One major


point of difference which could be found when compared to LOTR3 is the


climax. In LOTR 3, climax had surprises, twists and the victory seemed


liked a victory. In Avatar, climax does not stand upto that level


though it had the potential.In concise, as this review’s title says Avatar is A.v.a.t.a.r(A Visually And Technically Appealing Reprise).


Some movies are meant for heart(A Beautiful Mind), some movies are meant for mind(Shawshank Redemption), some movies are meant for smiles(Home Alone series) and some movies are meant for eyes(LOTR series). Avatar falls in the last bracket and caters to its audience justifiably.


Imagine


the time when a part of world will be devoid of a particular resource.


Thanks to visuals like these portrayed in Avatar, atleast our eyes will


have the luxury to see them. One does get these types of impressions in


back of their mind especially when current world scenarios are


experiencing a divide(referring to 2009 Climate Change Conference,


Copenhagen)


Lastly,


can’t say about Avatar’s Oscar score but definitely, James Cameron will


earn great respect as a visionary in the field of cinema. I end with


the lines I started with. It takes a lot of courage to think of absurd ideas and then implement them without supports from over-priced superstars.


Acknowledge it.


ps: when I started writing this review, IMDB gave a 8.4/10 and it was ranked 165; now it has a 8.9/10 and a rank of 51


Upload Photo

Upload Photos


Upload photo files with .jpg, .png and .gif extensions. Image size per photo cannot exceed 10 MB


Comment on this review

Read All Reviews

YOUR RATING ON

Avatar Movie
1
2
3
4
5
X