(For the title, I evaluated options like ‘My tricks to get more clicks’, ‘That phase of my life when I read for the sake of writing reviews’ etc, but rejected them as they are long and rhyming. Thus I decided on this title, which is 'short'and rhyming, and cheesy too)*
Synopsis: ‘Fooled By Randomness’ is a critique of the tendency to seek patterns, in all that is inherently random. Life is random.
Introduction: Mind performs a unique function of structuring all the information that is fed into it. We are inherently uncomfortable with lack of reasoning, structure and definition (At least most of us are. It’s called fear of absurdity.) So we keep trying to devise methods to predict the future, keep observing trends (eg. Is MS really on a downhill wrt content? Has the number of ‘opinions on people’ escalated beyond the number of ‘reviews on products’? Please note that dictionary.com categorically states ‘opinion’ to be a completely different word from ‘review’. I have consciously not quoted the dictionary definitions of ‘Opinion’ & ‘Review’, lest I end up plagiarizing word to word from a website)
Elucidation: Now let me put it in a ‘Mouthvshuttish’ mode of argument.
If a historian and a researcher in far future (or even better, arriving from a different universe) analyses a lot of Indian internet content and news, and tries to derive a correlation between ‘RSS feed’ and 'Hindu Fundamentalism', then would he not have substantial evidence for his arguments? (I hope my argument isn’t similar, and that my punctuations, sentence length, and SOH content are ‘favorably balanced’. With so many bumbling examples in motion, writng reviews on MS is getting easier by the day)
Thus, 'Fooled By Randomness', in my opinion, is an attempt to make us slightly aware of the 'possible' mistakes that we may be making in assessing reality, and thus fooling ourselves. While probability may be the religion for all those who do not believe in God, this book doesn’t leave much for the believer to cling on to, except her own personal sense of right and wrong in a random world.
The Writer:Nassim Nicholas Taleb has spent the better part of his life trying *to tease people who take the quality of their knowledge too seriously.
(The previous line in italics sure exists on the net, but I have, honestly, typed every word of it. The author has mentioned the same in his book too. My mother tongue may include Hindi, English, Punjabi, Bhojpuri & SMS *par main Goo-gal nahin karda)
Reading a person with such a profound aim in life, has to be entertaining.
The Content:Most part of the book does contain examples from the field of stock market to prove the point. But it is not a guide to the stock market. A dentist’s profession is definitely less affected by randomness than a Trader’s, and the writer accepts it.
The book is like an encyclopedia of extremely interesting concepts like Reverse Turing test, Dada Engine, Monte Carlo Simulations.
The Black Swan, Pascal’s Wager (and many more) and the writer has also introduced concepts of his own, that are equally captivating, like ‘Wittgenstein’s Ruler’ and Solon’s Warning (NO, its not miss-spelt, has nothing to do with Colon and is NOT a reaction to any law of motion explained by a certain infamous Prof. Shakarotti. He is not a victim of Newton's IPR infringements)
The style of the author is light, admirable and displays the extent of rigor undertaken before making bold statements.
And yes, talking about being bold, the author goes to the extent of questioning the scientific process (that basically starts at Hypothesis and ends at a Theory) saying that “there exist only two types of theories, those that have been proven wrong, and those that are yet to be proven wrong.”
*Strongly recommended to those who enjoy the idea of randomness and probability. And recommended to others too.
PS.** Have you heard of “impairments in socialization, communication, and imagination, with stereotyped repetitive interests taking the place of creative play”. This is taken from mindship.com and refers to ‘autism’ in general. I feel MS is beyond it, and IF it isn’t, then it’s the MS’ians who are responsible and not the management.
Having said that, I think Mister CEO (who is the only person shown on the MS Management section) has a tough task ahead. He is playing in an era of online social revolutions and WEB2.0. I for one am keen on tracking the development of MS in the coming years to see what different can MS do to remain at the blue end of the ocean. Exciting times to formulate future ready brand strategies Faisal. ATB.
PPS. I have read almost 50% of reviews about MS on MS recently, and tracked a lot of heated discussions. I apologise for not mentioning all of them overtly, except the DOC, whose review impressed me the most in my last 3-4 years on MS (close contenders are dismantle brigade's full stop lessons and Girlnextstore & her malignant friend's pseudointellectual guide to chosing gifts for your girlfriends). I know this is unfortunate as MS is not about writing skills but product attributes. But who decides that? Food for thought Faisal!?
PPPS. I agree that this review deserved a place among the many “General Views On MS” section, but then I feel that defeats the purpose of MS. As explained, Opinions are different from Reviews, and I just felt I could convey a message even while writing a product review.
- Thank You! We appreciate your effort.