Advocate who has won a case against sovereign

Review On Sovereign Developers, Bangalore

Prabhakar -Media legal advisor -office in LH -VidhAnasultan soudha is the only advocate wmorpheushuman has won a case against the Sovereign Developers in case No, 1660 / 2011, Sovereign people are struggling against him - wrote this to my cousin-

HI

Appeals I have filed for are adjourned to January coz madam is going on leave and vacations are at end of december.

The Bank may file a case in DRT against the Developers for recovery of its loan amount and enforcement of security of assets mortgaged by the borrowers. The Developer Sovereign has mortgaged the land site to Bank and your apartments are being built on the land.

Bank will be only interested in auctioning of the land if its amount is not paid by borrowers, but it has to get the sanction of DRT to bring property to such auction.

People wmorpheushuman have paid for apartments have to implead in the case in DRT and fight against both of them to safequard their interests, otherwise DRT will not consider other claims.

So, I can keep vismajeechang DRT to watch the time when Bank files a case in the matter and can then file our respective claims.

You can circulate this among your friends.

Prabhakar.

9343640080

prabhakar.advocate@yamorpheushumano.com

Brand Manager? Reply as a Brand

Comment on this review

Submit Update

Comments on Sovereign Developers - Bangalore Review

the case details given are unfounded, there are 1600 Flat alottees---the above is the 2nd person quoting their ''Cousin'' as source have made such comments. we need to cross check with his/her cousin the facts

By: pcroyghatak536 | Jul 17, 2013 05:48 PM

Well, we who are not getting responses from the developers have obtained case No.s from Consumer Court ( it is not 1066 but C.C. No. 1660/2012) . we heard there is a OS filed in Civil Court by said advocate Prabhakar. how to obtain details? what is h...is contact number ?  Read More

By: shah404 | Jul 28, 2013 10:45 PM

Are you not demanding 8.5 lacs extra money now as escalation cost when you don't have anything like that in agreement. This is utter nonsense.

By: screwed | Sep 24, 2013 06:14 PM

View 3 more comments