Shravanthi Shelters - Bangalore Image

Worst project - Shravanthi Palladium

31% 1 32 Reviews Claim this business
OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
Worst project - Shravanthi Palladium
Oct 17, 2021 06:02 PM 3526 views
(Updated Oct 17, 2021 06:03 PM)

Customer Service:

Staff Courtesy:

Product Implementation Rate:

The builder is a hopeless fellow, project is started on feb 2014 today is oct 2021 till now he has not completed the project and handed over the project to the residents who are leaving currently . who are interested to buy the Shravanthi palladium project kindly visit the site personally . don't go by his adds in paper, or any print media or by their marketing persons . look and corner of the apartment seepage is happening till now it has not been addressed . none of the amenities are completed like swimming pool, Club house, community hall, STP . When heavy rain comes in -1 basment will look like another swimming pool. . see the sample photos . till now he has not painted outer part of the building . basic facilities like intercom, cctv not provided when residents asked regarding this he told we have not mentioned in the broacher so we not not providing it . If you want these facilities you need to pay for that . The company people does not give any respect to the customers . My last suggestion is that do not buy this property at all, if you buy the property you will going to suffer a lot . Total 100 flats he has constructed till now he has sold only 29 flats only from last 5 years this shows how the building quality and their marketing people are working towards . when any customers visit the office and tell that we has saw the reviews of the apartment it is not good then MD tell that do not go by the reviews they are all falls . if any one interested in buying the property come and visit the directly to the site and speak with the owners who have took the apartment and leaving their. this is not a fake review it is a genuine review .



Please rate this review usefulnessRating Breakup

Very Useful (39%)

Useful (61%)

Not Useful (0%)

Comment on this review