Sheth Developers - Mumbai Image

Disgusting Sales Staff of Sheth Builders

33% 1 21 Reviews Claim this business
OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
Disgusting Sales Staff of Sheth Builders
Nov 08, 2012 08:31 PM 25353 views
(Updated Nov 08, 2012 10:44 PM)

Customer Service:

Staff Courtesy:

Product Implementation Rate:

I asked for a photocopy of documents that my wife and daughter were being made to sign for booking a flat at Sheth Midori in Dahisar East.  Girish M. Rawat at the Site Office stated that he could not give my wife and daughter even a photocopy of what they were being made to sign and told us that the Agreement would be drawn up only after about six months.  I found this a bad proposition.  Therefore, the offer of a flat at Sheth Midori was not accepted by us.  Since the deal was not completed, the documents were withdrawn, the four cheques and the PAN cards of my wife and daughter were returned by Girish Rawat.


Later, I was surprised to receive an extremely rude telephone call from Nisha Barot on my cell phone, claiming to be from Sheth Builders, falsely alleging that I had "snatched" the papers from Girish Rawat and threatening of dire consequences if  my family ever entered their site again.  I found it strange that the sales staff should ask my wife and daughter to sign documents but deny them and their lawyers the right to even a photocopy for referral to the terms of the deal and deny them even a receipt "subject to realization of cheque", which is a norm in business ethics.


Obviously, I do not wish to deal with Sheth Builders any more and I now realize why there are several complaints from people like Samir (see propertyscam.in/product-review/sheth-developers-2/"), Sunita Salunkhe, Vindhya Ramesh and Vasumathi Krishanan (see articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-09-19/mumbai/28230519_1_flat-buyers-ad
vance-payments-deposits".  I advise extreme caution to anyone wanting to deal with such staff of Sheth Builders.



Please rate this review usefulnessRating Breakup

Very Useful (39%)

Useful (61%)

Not Useful (0%)

Comment on this review