Puravankara Builders - Bangalore Image

Purva Venezia: Delays, Lies, Screwing Residents

17% 1 160 Reviews Claim this business
OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
Bangalore India

Purva Venezia: Delays, Lies, Screwing Residents
Dec 17, 2011 05:19 PM 10389 views

Customer Service:

Staff Courtesy:

Product Implementation Rate:

I fell for Purvankara's marketing messages and thought they were one of the top builders.  The Purva Venezia in Yelahanka, bangalore is one of the poorly executed projects with inferior quality tiles, doors and interiors.


To add to this they have been lying to their customers about delivery and not delivered the project even after 6 years (might take another 2-3 years to complete).  Residents have started to live because of the Rent+EMI double whammy, but they have no amenities even though they paid for it 2-5 yrs ago. Puravankara also added penalty to residents for no paying their instalments on time. Yes, they have delayed it by 4 years, and charging interest on residents. Management is indifferent to the residents as they don't care (they have already taken the money).


The project is still woefully incomplete and they are screwing the early residents with  additional charges and trying to improperly spend resident's maintenance charges. Go to this site, talk tot he residents, and see for yourself. Stay away from this builder.



Please rate this review usefulnessRating Breakup

Very Useful (39%)

Useful (61%)

Not Useful (0%)

Brand Response

Dear Customer,
Greetings from Puravankara!
This mail is to keep you informed that we have read the review you have posted in www.mouthshut.com about your experience with us.

We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused to you.
We at Puravankara would like to address your concerns as soon as possible and hence request you to kindly share your contact details along with Project name & apartment number with us.
Looking forward to hear from you soon.
Warm regards
Team Puravankara

Upload Photo

By: Puravankara_Corp | May 30, 2014  06:42 PM Comments 0

See full communications

Comment on this review