Aparna Constructions and Estates - Hyderabad Image

Aparna Should Stop Extortion after Sales

27% 2 99 Reviews Claim this business
OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
Aparna Should Stop Extortion after Sales
Jun 08, 2014 02:26 PM 60313 views

Customer Service:

Staff Courtesy:

Product Implementation Rate:

Once you have purchased your property from Aparna then you will able to see the real picture when the APMS(Aparana Property Management Service) takes on.


Here are the points:


Maintenance without Actual Service




  1. I am staying in Aparna Hill Park Avanues, there is no Manjeera Water Connection After the handover of 6 months, there was no Piped Gas as promised for 3 months, Intercom not functionally yet but they are charging maintenance  around 3000 per month for 1150 Spf flat.




Monopoly:




  1. They have probably some setup with Intercom, Cable and Net provider called "PIONEER". These guyz are worst in the world and pathetic service. But Aparna has decided to go with them for some unknown reason as there are good players like Beam and Airtel. I hope you guyz understand why this happened.This PIONEER guy keep on working with APARNA with different Names . Once it gets a bad review, it changes it's name and works with another of their project with new name. So don't get fooled by that. Ask your sales agent who is that and on what credibility it has been choose.




*Unfair Charges



  1. There were more surprise when we were communicated we have to pay 2400 per month for electricity and Water(No water by the way) for our vacant flats but reduced down to 700 when every one resisted.




They are other things as Unfair Club house charges but I am not going to hype this up now. Mail me if you need more info on that.


Undoubtedly the construction quality is unbeatable but seems that is what they are bothered about as it helps in selling.


The main Culprit is Aparna Property Management Services, so guys, you have the option .



Please rate this review usefulnessRating Breakup

Very Useful (39%)

Useful (61%)

Not Useful (0%)

Comment on this review