MouthShut.com Would Like to Send You Push Notifications. Notification may includes alerts, activities & updates.

OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
For Business
MouthShut Logo
Upload Photo

MouthShut Score

45%
2.91 

Sound Reception:

User friendly:

Style & Design:

Other Features:

Look & Feel:

Value for Money:

Nokia

×
Supported file formats : jpg, png, and jpeg


Cancel

I feel this review is:

Fake
Genuine

To justify genuineness of your review kindly attach purchase proof
No File Selected

Not so good
Dec 27, 2005 08:13 PM 4262 Views
(Updated Dec 27, 2005 08:13 PM)

Sound Reception:

User friendly:

Style & Design:

Other Features:

Look & Feel:

Value for Money:

When I moved to Mumbai and migrated from Airtel to Reliance, I had very little to choose from, as far as the handsets were concerned. Most of the models they advertised were not available, and the best available was Nokia 6225. I regretted my choice soon after.


The handset cost me too much, the resolution of the camera was very poor, many features available in the GSM version were turned off by Reliance. Moreover, I couldn't transfer any photos that I took on my phone to a computer till date (have been using it for about 9 months now); the reason being the DKU5 cable (only data cable recommended by Nokia) was not compatible with Reliance's 6225! After 8 months, I was told to get a costlier cable because, according to the Reliance Webworld person, DKU5 was not supported anymore! There is no option to send or receive ringtones, compose ringtones, or do any other stuff. The only way to have a polyphonic ringtone was to upload it as a midi file (unable to do due to the data cable).


Emails cannot be sent or received as it was only for R-World customers, and Rworld is not meant to be given on 6225.


I would have fared well, with more cash in hand, if I had got an ordinary mobile phone with plain FM and a poorer resolution camera.


image

Comment on this review

Read All Reviews

YOUR RATING ON

Nokia 6225
1
2
3
4
5
X